<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How I&#8217;m Building Scalability Into My Practice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roadtoindependenceblog.com/2007/08/31/how-im-building-scalability-into-my-practice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roadtoindependenceblog.com/2007/08/31/how-im-building-scalability-into-my-practice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 01:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Patton</title>
		<link>http://www.roadtoindependenceblog.com/2007/08/31/how-im-building-scalability-into-my-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Patton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">ia-wordup-8119#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Good comments. The purpose, in my view, is not to CYA but to assess the clients risk tolerance as accurately as possible. I don&#039;t think clients relate to a gain or loss in percentage terms as well as they would in dollar terms. Also, it&#039;s important to relate the gain/loss potential of the account in the context of their overall wealth. Dr. Kahneman discusses this issue of framing the problem. For instance, instead of saying the account may lose $X or gain $Y he would say your net worth, as a result of this account (in part), may decline to $X or increase to $Y. On the issue of the gap between the risk Q and the model portfolio, I use MCS to simulate the performance of the account for various periods. This &quot;range&quot; is broken out into deciles and I use this to illustrate the potential variance of the account (even though there may be outliers). What do you mean by a benchmark?
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comments. The purpose, in my view, is not to CYA but to assess the clients risk tolerance as accurately as possible. I don&#8217;t think clients relate to a gain or loss in percentage terms as well as they would in dollar terms. Also, it&#8217;s important to relate the gain/loss potential of the account in the context of their overall wealth. Dr. Kahneman discusses this issue of framing the problem. For instance, instead of saying the account may lose $X or gain $Y he would say your net worth, as a result of this account (in part), may decline to $X or increase to $Y. On the issue of the gap between the risk Q and the model portfolio, I use MCS to simulate the performance of the account for various periods. This &#8220;range&#8221; is broken out into deciles and I use this to illustrate the potential variance of the account (even though there may be outliers). What do you mean by a benchmark?<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOHN HAMEL</title>
		<link>http://www.roadtoindependenceblog.com/2007/08/31/how-im-building-scalability-into-my-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHN HAMEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">ia-wordup-8119#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Several years ago I built a risk tolerance for a very successful RIA firm.

I looked for research that showed what percent amount clients could stomach in losses. I never did find any but if you know of sources please let me know.  Saddly, I found many in the industry to admit that it was mostly to CYA the firm. Many times the advisor told the client what answer to select.  I don&#039;t blame the advisor for this because the questionnaire did little to assess the client&#039;s risk.

I believe more research in this area is critical if an advisor were to really assess his clients true risk tolerance. I think the biggest gap is between the risk tolerance questionnaire and the matching of that with investment models.

My question: How can an advisor really assess a client&#039;s risk tolerance if there&#039;s no benchmark?  And without a benchmark: How can you say that a 15% loss is a Moderate Risk Portfolio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago I built a risk tolerance for a very successful RIA firm.</p>
<p>I looked for research that showed what percent amount clients could stomach in losses. I never did find any but if you know of sources please let me know.  Saddly, I found many in the industry to admit that it was mostly to CYA the firm. Many times the advisor told the client what answer to select.  I don&#8217;t blame the advisor for this because the questionnaire did little to assess the client&#8217;s risk.</p>
<p>I believe more research in this area is critical if an advisor were to really assess his clients true risk tolerance. I think the biggest gap is between the risk tolerance questionnaire and the matching of that with investment models.</p>
<p>My question: How can an advisor really assess a client&#8217;s risk tolerance if there&#8217;s no benchmark?  And without a benchmark: How can you say that a 15% loss is a Moderate Risk Portfolio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOHN HAMEL</title>
		<link>http://www.roadtoindependenceblog.com/2007/08/31/how-im-building-scalability-into-my-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHN HAMEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">ia-wordup-8119#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Several years ago I built a risk tolerance for a very successful RIA firm.

I looked for research that showed what percent amount clients could stomach in losses. I never did find any but if you know of sources please let me know.  Saddly, I found many in the industry to admit that it was mostly to CYA the firm. Many times the advisor told the client what answer to select.  I don&#039;t blame the advisor for this because the questionnaire did little to assess the client&#039;s risk.

I believe more research in this area is critical if an advisor were to really assess his clients true risk tolerance. I think the biggest gap is between the risk tolerance questionnaire and the matching of that with investment models.

My question: How can an advisor really assess a client&#039;s risk tolerance if there&#039;s no benchmark?  And without a benchmark: How can you say that a 15% loss is a Moderate Risk Portfolio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago I built a risk tolerance for a very successful RIA firm.</p>
<p>I looked for research that showed what percent amount clients could stomach in losses. I never did find any but if you know of sources please let me know.  Saddly, I found many in the industry to admit that it was mostly to CYA the firm. Many times the advisor told the client what answer to select.  I don&#8217;t blame the advisor for this because the questionnaire did little to assess the client&#8217;s risk.</p>
<p>I believe more research in this area is critical if an advisor were to really assess his clients true risk tolerance. I think the biggest gap is between the risk tolerance questionnaire and the matching of that with investment models.</p>
<p>My question: How can an advisor really assess a client&#8217;s risk tolerance if there&#8217;s no benchmark?  And without a benchmark: How can you say that a 15% loss is a Moderate Risk Portfolio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PATRICK VALENTY</title>
		<link>http://www.roadtoindependenceblog.com/2007/08/31/how-im-building-scalability-into-my-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>PATRICK VALENTY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">ia-wordup-8119#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Your risk questionnaire and process is very interesting.  What are chances of getting a copy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your risk questionnaire and process is very interesting.  What are chances of getting a copy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
